Citation link:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:hbz:467-11360
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Schoenecker_A_free_will_and_a_will_under_moral_laws_are_the_same.pdf | 596.45 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Dokument Type: | Book Part | metadata.dc.title: | "A free will and a will under moral laws are the same": Kant’s concept of autonomy and his thesis of analyticity in Groundwork III | Authors: | Schönecker, Dieter | Institute: | Fakultät I Philosophische Fakultät | Dewey Decimal Classification: | 100 Philosophie | GHBS-Clases: | JIQR | Issue Date: | 2013 | Publish Date: | 2017 | Source: | Sensen, Oliver (Hrsg.): Kant on moral autonomy. Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge University Press, 2013. - ISBN 978-1-107-00486-3, S. 225 - 245 | Abstract: | In section 1 of GMS III, Kant claims that “a free will and a will under moral laws are the same” (447.6–10). 1 h is claim expresses Kant’s concept of autonomy; after all, the concept of freedom is the “key” (446.6) to this concept. So if we understand freedom in its relation to morality, we understand autonomy. But how are we to understand this relation? On the standard reading, Kant’s claim is that a free will is under the moral law as a Categorical Imperative (CI); hence, once it is shown that we are free it is shown that we are obliged by the CI. 2 h is interpretation, I will argue, is incorrect. |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:hbz:467-11360 | URI: | https://dspace.ub.uni-siegen.de/handle/ubsi/1136 | License: | https://dspace.ub.uni-siegen.de/static/license.txt |
Appears in Collections: | Publikationen aus der Universität Siegen |
This item is protected by original copyright |
Page view(s)
1,155
checked on Nov 30, 2024
Download(s)
409
checked on Nov 30, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.