Citation link: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:hbz:467-11360
Files in This Item:
Dokument Type: Book Part
metadata.dc.title: "A free will and a will under moral laws are the same": Kant’s concept of autonomy and his thesis of analyticity in Groundwork III
Authors: Schönecker, Dieter 
Institute: Fakultät I Philosophische Fakultät 
Dewey Decimal Classification: 100 Philosophie
GHBS-Clases: JIQR
Issue Date: 2013
Publish Date: 2017
Source: Sensen, Oliver (Hrsg.): Kant on moral autonomy. Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge University Press, 2013. - ISBN 978-1-107-00486-3, S. 225 - 245
Abstract: 
In section 1 of GMS III, Kant claims that “a free will and a will under
moral laws are the same” (447.6–10). 1 h is claim expresses Kant’s concept
of autonomy; after all, the concept of freedom is the “key” (446.6) to
this concept. So if we understand freedom in its relation to morality, we
understand autonomy. But how are we to understand this relation? On
the standard reading, Kant’s claim is that a free will is under the moral
law as a Categorical Imperative (CI); hence, once it is shown that we are
free it is shown that we are obliged by the CI. 2 h is interpretation, I will
argue, is incorrect.
URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:467-11360
URI: https://dspace.ub.uni-siegen.de/handle/ubsi/1136
License: https://dspace.ub.uni-siegen.de/static/license.txt
Appears in Collections:Publikationen aus der Universität Siegen

This item is protected by original copyright

Show full item record

Page view(s)

1,158
checked on Dec 1, 2024

Download(s)

410
checked on Dec 1, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.